Rethinking the Role of Clinical Psychologists in Contemporary Mental Health Care: A Case for Counsellors’ Expanded Competency

Singapore

May 26 2025

Introduction

The landscape of mental health care is evolving rapidly, marked by a growing recognition of the diverse roles and competencies across professions. Traditionally, clinical psychologists have been viewed as the apex providers of psychological interventions, particularly for complex mental health conditions. However, advances in training accessibility and therapeutic modalities have challenged this hierarchy. Counsellors, equipped with specialised certifications such as those from the Beck Institute and trained in advanced therapies, are increasingly delivering high-quality cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and other evidence-based interventions. This article explores the evolving role of clinical psychologists, questions the necessity of their “unique” contributions from a client-centred outcome perspective, and advocates for a collaborative, competency-based model that better serves client needs.

Counsellors and Psychiatrists: A Collaborative Treatment Model

In many jurisdictions, including Singapore, psychiatrists hold the authority to diagnose mental health disorders and manage pharmacological treatment (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Counsellors, especially those with advanced training and certification in modalities such as CBT, schema therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), are fully capable of delivering effective psychological interventions (Beck, 2011; Linehan, 1993; Shapiro, 2018). In this model, psychiatrists provide diagnostic clarity and medical management, while counsellors implement evidence-based therapy tailored to client needs. This partnership effectively bypasses the need for a clinical psychologist as an intermediary in many cases, particularly when the client’s condition is within the scope of these professionals’ expertise.

The Unique Offerings of Clinical Psychologists: An Examination

Clinical psychologists traditionally assert a unique role based on several core competencies: conducting comprehensive psychological assessments, providing complex case formulations, offering specialised therapy for severe or treatment-resistant conditions, and leading multidisciplinary teams (Kazdin, 2008; Norcross & Lambert, 2018). While these capabilities have value, their practical relevance to client outcomes warrants scrutiny.

Psychological Assessment: The administration of psychometric tests and diagnostic clarification can be essential in educational, forensic, or highly complex clinical contexts (Groth-Marnat & Wright, 2016). However, for many therapy clients, such formal assessment is not a prerequisite for effective treatment.
Case Formulation: Detailed psychological formulations can enhance therapeutic precision. Yet, when overly intellectualised, they risk alienating clients who seek straightforward, empathetic support (Johnstone & Dallos, 2014).
Specialised Therapy: Clinical psychologists often utilise advanced therapeutic models. Nonetheless, counsellors trained in these same modalities demonstrate comparable competency and effectiveness (Wampold, 2015; Norcross & Wampold, 2019).
System Leadership: Clinical psychologists frequently assume leadership roles within healthcare systems. This contribution, while important for service coordination, is largely invisible to and unappreciated by individual clients.

Client-Centred Outcomes Over Professional Hierarchy

The critical question is whether these so-called unique contributions translate into better client outcomes. Evidence suggests that therapeutic alliance, clinician empathy, and treatment fidelity are stronger predictors of success than professional title or academic prestige (Horvath et al., 2011; Lambert & Barley, 2001). Clients prioritise relational connection, accessibility, and trust over formal qualifications.

Furthermore, the expansion of counsellor competencies, supported by rigorous training and supervision, challenges the notion of clinical psychology’s exclusivity. Counsellors effectively treat complex presentations, including personality disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and trauma-related conditions, especially when working in collaboration with psychiatrists who manage diagnosis and medication (Norcross, 2011; Beck Institute, 2023).

Towards a Collaborative and Competency-Based Mental Health Ecosystem

The evolving realities of mental health care call for a shift from hierarchical, title-driven models to collaborative, competency-based frameworks. Recognising counsellors as capable and valuable providers not only improves client access to care but also fosters multidisciplinary respect and innovation (Geller et al., 2016; Southam-Gerow et al., 2016).

Clinical psychologists retain vital roles in specialised assessment, research, and systemic leadership. However, they must also embrace collaboration, humility, and a client-centred focus that transcends professional ego.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while clinical psychologists offer specialised skills valuable in certain contexts, their purportedly unique contributions do not always result in improved client outcomes when compared to competent, well-trained counsellors working alongside psychiatrists. Mental health care should prioritise effective, accessible, and empathetic interventions over professional gatekeeping. Embracing a collaborative, competency-based model will better meet client needs and advance the field towards holistic, person-centred care.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Geller, J., Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2016). Therapist empathy: Definition, components, and correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 19–29.
Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment (6th ed.). Wiley.
Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16.
Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63(3), 146–159.
Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 357–361.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
Norcross, J. C. (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness. Oxford University Press.
Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2018). Psychotherapy relationships that work III. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 303–315.
Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2019). A new therapy for each patient: Evidence-based relationships and responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(11), 1915–1928.
Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Southam-Gerow, M. A., Rodríguez, A., Chorpita, B. F., & Daleiden, E. L. (2016). Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments for youth: Challenges and recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(4), 309–316.
Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270–277.